Thursday, October 3, 2013

Charles Bukowski's Advice for Writers

Writing is cathartic. According to Charles Bukowski, "There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed."  This is one of my favorite poems and fits the discussion about the creative-writing process by students.  Journalistic writing is a bit different, the bleeding comes from the eyes and fingers from fact-checking, truth-gathering, and requests for FOIA documents.

Charles Bukowski

So You Want to Be a Writer

if it doesn't come bursting out of you
in spite of everything,
don't do it.
unless it comes unasked out of your
heart and your mind and your mouth
and your gut,
don't do it.
if you have to sit for hours
staring at your computer screen
or hunched over your typewriter
searching for words,
don't do it.
if you're doing it for money or fame,
don't do it.
if you're doing it because you want
women in your bed,
don't do it.
if you have to sit there and
rewrite it again and again,
don't do it.
if it's hard work just thinking about doing it,
don't do it.
if you're trying to write like somebody else,
forget about it.

if you have to wait for it to roar out of you,
then wait patiently.
if it never does roar out of you,
do something else.

if you first have to read it to your wife
or your girlfriend or your boyfriend
or your parents or to anybody at all,
you're not ready.

don't be like so many writers,
don't be like so many thousands of
people who call themselves writers,
don't be dull and boring and pretentious,
don't be consumed with self-love.
the libraries of the world have
yawned themselves to sleep
over your kind.
don't add to that.
don't do it.
unless it comes out of
your soul like a rocket,
unless being still would
drive you to madness or
suicide or murder,
don't do it.
unless the sun inside you is
burning your gut,
don't do it.

when it is truly time,
and if you have been chosen,
it will do it by itself
and it will keep on doing it
until you die or it dies in you.

there is no other way.

and there never was.


From sifting through the madness for the Word, the line, the way by Charles Bukowski. Copyright © 2003 by the Estate of Charles Bukowski - See more at: http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/16549#sthash.s2Z5ekBT.dpuf
 From sifting through the madness for the Word, the line, the way by Charles Bukowski. (2003)
"Q. How do you know what you know? Name one new thing you learned using a social media site today and explain why you believe it is true. What source did you use to acquire this information? At times, are social media sites reliable for obtaining credible information?"


How do I know what I know:  Experience. Books. Newspapers. Internet surfing. Word-of-mouth. Formal and continuing education. Documentary films and public service television like C-SPAN and PBS.  With these points of reference you can extrapolate bits into a larger picture, turning information into knowledge.

Today I watched the documentary movie, Vaccine Nation. It is posted on a membership site online that I enjoy, greenmedinfo.com.  I now believe that the current vaccination schedule for children may be causing the epidemic of neurological disease in children.

There is no reliable source to reference a mother's intuition. As such, these types of counter-culture opinions that vary from the mainstream popular view have to be carefully vetted for accuracy or there are strong repercussions, including jail time for parents that wish to decline, or just forestall, the heavy vaccination schedule.  Although greenmedinfo.com is a special interest group, they utilize an extensive database which they say is  "the world's most widely referenced, open access, natural medicine database, with 20000+ study abstracts and references."

I admit that I have a bias, based on experience. But I read both sides of the issue and I no longer take statements at face-value alone. When my child was diagnosed with autism, I myself had to step across the threshold of comfortable faith from what I had previously accepted, and unlearn before re-learning.  My knowledge and information base widened --  medical journals like JAMA, online medical publication sites like PubMed, VAERS and other government databases, scientific journals and magazines, antique folk-medicine and veterinary books, off-the-record chats with doctors, court documents, studying the basis for herbal and chinese medicine, nutrition textbooks and social networking with other parents.

 I do believe there are many good websites for obtaining credible information, and some very bad websites that are published by special-interest, commercial for-profit sites and 'communication experts' schooled in the psychological realm of consumer and political sway; consumers of the internet (as paying customers) should be taught to become aware of the biases, conflicts of interests and motive. Then, it's possible put together all the small pieces of the puzzle into the larger picture to offset any internal or external bias that may have been missed, as consumer, investigator and writer. Because each of the small portions of knowledge will, together, form a verifiable and credible piece of journalism, or opinion, that may need to be acted upon and, perhaps, legally defended.



           "Here the ways of men part: if you wish to strive for peace of soul and pleasure, then believe; if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire."  F. Nietzsche (1865)


Sources:
Vaccine Nation documentary film by Gary Null (2008)
http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/vaccine-nation-36-injections-per-child-yet-few-question-why/
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/guide/health-guide-vaccine-research
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/US/story?id=3866502&page=1
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21839294/ns/health-childrens_health/t/parents-face-jail-not-vaccinating-their-kids/#.UlAgUiRLo0w
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/index
Bibliography:
Kovach, B., Rosenstiel, T., (2011) Blur --  How To Know What's True In The Age of Information Overload, NY, Bloomsbury USA







What forms of new media do you use daily? How has new social media influenced your perspective of events? Are these positive or negative influences?

Currently, I only use the Internet, having cancelled both my cable television and landline telephone.  I am utilizing Facebook to keep in touch with friends, Craigslist for second-hand purchases, YouTube and Netflix for entertainment, Gmail instant chat, DVDs and CD-ROM, and many websites that I have a newsfeed from. From the Internet, I can make free phone calls on Skype and MagicJack, streaming video and audio recordings, download photographs from my digital cameras to social media for publication, and of course, email.

Recently I cancelled my AT&T 3G cell phone contract due to the Edward Snowden leaks that this company and many others were either allowing or forced to include a backdoor opening for unwarranted surveillance of American citizens by the National Security Agency. I felt it was important to make a statement that this was unacceptable to me, personally. I have been without mobile communications and computing for about six months, and though it is difficult, believe I made a strong decision that affects the companies that have the clout to lawyer-up to the NSA.  This has also impacted the way I use social media sites like Facebook and Google.

I try to make my social media a positive influence in my life and my child's life, while minimizing the negative influences as much as possible.

Do you think cancelling my TV and commercial phone contracts is 'radical' and extreme to make a point?  Let me know!


Source: Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian (2013)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-interview-video